3/2/2023 0 Comments Tema zw widget jamThis study evaluated the association between exposure to a school-based SBI program and reductions in substance use among youths after enactment of a law that required Massachusetts schools to provide SBI to all students. Importance Screening and brief intervention (SBI) programs in schools have the potential to provide substance use prevention messages to large numbers of adolescents. Shared Decision Making and Communication.Scientific Discovery and the Future of Medicine.Health Care Economics, Insurance, Payment.Clinical Implications of Basic Neuroscience.Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography.Mirrored Density Plot of Propensity Scores in Full Baseline School Grades, Including 13 School Grades That Received SBI and 21 Control School Grades, Before and After Overlap Weighting Differences in Substance Use Behavior Changes Between SBI and Control School Grades From Baseline to Follow-up When SBI Groups Received the CRAFFT2 and NIAAAĮFigure. Differences in Substance Use Behavior Changes Between SBI and Control School Grades From Baseline to Follow-up When SBI Groups Received the CRAFFTĮTable 11. Differences in Substance Use Behavior Changes Between SBI and Control School Grades in Grades 9 and 10 From Baseline to Follow-up, Excluding 2 Schools With Less Intensive SBIĮTable 10. Differences in Substance Use Behavior Changes Between SBI and Control School Grades From Baseline to Follow-up, by GenderĮTable 9. Differences in Changes in Secondary Outcomes Between SBI and Control School Grades From Baseline to Follow-up, Overlap Weighted Without Adjusting for Additional CovariatesĮTable 8. Differences in Substance Use Behavior Changes Between SBI and Control School Grades From Baseline to Follow-up, Overlap Weighted Without Adjusting for Additional CovariatesĮTable 7. Baseline Characteristics of SBI and Control School Grades Before Propensity Score Overlap Weighting, Stratified by School TypeĮTable 6. Unweighted Baseline Characteristics of 4587 Total ParticipantsĮTable 5. Baseline Characteristics of 1721 Participants in Grades 9 and 10 Before and After Propensity Score Overlap WeightingĮTable 4. Baseline Characteristics of 2866 Participants in Grades 7 and 8 Before and After Propensity Score Overlap WeightingĮTable 3. Baseline Characteristics of Students Included vs Excluded in the Analytic SampleĮTable 2. Survey, Survey Data Interval, School Grade–Level Summary Data for Propensity Score Estimation, Covariates, and Overview of Secondary Outcome AnalysesĮTable 1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |